Should You Use Buy Now, Pay Later for Travel? A Refund‑Risk × Due‑Date Checklist

Author Rafael

Rafael

Published on

Travel is where payment “convenience” gets stress-tested: cancellations, significant schedule changes, delayed bags, and suppliers that point fingers at each other. Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) adds another layer to that chain. That can be fine—if you treat BNPL as a logistics problem, not a perk.

This post is a refund‑risk × due‑date checklist. The point is simple: you should know exactly who controls the refund pipeline and whether your installment schedule can survive a “refund pending” window. If you can’t answer those questions before you book, BNPL is usually the wrong tool for travel.

The two risks that matter for travel BNPL

1) Refund risk: “Am I owed a refund, and how does it reach me?”

For U.S. flights, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has sharpened the baseline: prompt, automatic refunds when a flight is canceled or significantly changed and the passenger doesn’t accept alternatives, plus certain refunds for delayed bags and unprovided ancillary services (under the 2024 final rule). But eligibility and the timeline still depend on the scenario and the payment channel you used. The DOT’s consumer guidance also emphasizes a practical detail people miss: the “merchant of record” (airline vs ticket agent/OTA) affects who you deal with for refunds.
Sources: DOT Final Rule (Apr 24, 2024), DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

BNPL complicates this because your refund may need to travel through multiple systems: merchant → BNPL provider → your card/bank posting. BNPL providers themselves describe this propagation: the merchant must process the refund first; then the BNPL account reflects it; and if a card refund is due, it can take additional business days depending on the financial institution.
Source: Afterpay refunds article (Jul 6, 2023)

2) Due‑date risk: “Can I keep paying while the refund/dispute is unresolved?”

The most common BNPL structure is “pay‑in‑4”: a portion due at purchase, with the rest on a two‑week cadence. That cadence can stack fast if you book multiple trip components. The CFPB’s 2025 BNPL market report describes this structure and also reports that late fees occurred in a measurable share of loans in the sample (e.g., 4.1% assessed a late fee in 2023).
Source: CFPB BNPL Market Report (Dec 2025 PDF)

Meanwhile, the CFPB has emphasized that consumers should be able to dispute charges and obtain refunds with BNPL products in a credit‑card‑like way, including the expectation (in prepared remarks) that consumers generally should not have to make payments while a dispute is investigated, and that refunds should be reflected as credits on the BNPL account. But supervisory findings show reality can be messy: examiners found some lenders failed to timely resolve disputes, leaving consumers without refunds for months and, in some cases, facing unpredictable “catch‑up” payment demands after delayed investigations.
Sources: CFPB interpretive action (May 22, 2024), CFPB prepared remarks (May 22, 2024), CFPB Supervisory Highlights Issue 37 (Jan 6, 2025)

That mismatch—what should happen vs what can happen—is why travel BNPL decisions should start with checklists, not marketing.

The Refund‑Risk × Due‑Date Checklist (use this before you click “Pay”)

Treat this as a gate: if you can’t get clear answers, assume the worst‑case timeline and decide accordingly.

A. Refund‑risk questions (the pipeline)

  1. Who is the merchant of record?
    Is it the airline/hotel, or a ticket agent/OTA? DOT guidance flags merchant‑of‑record as a key factor in refund handling.
    Source: DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

  2. What refund scenario are you actually in? (for U.S. flights)
    DOT guidance describes refund entitlement scenarios like cancellation or significant delay/change, with timing thresholds for what counts as “significant” (e.g., 3+ hours domestic, 6+ hours international for certain early/late changes) and provides general refund timing expectations.
    Source: DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

  3. What is the refund timing baseline for the payment method?
    DOT guidance describes that refunds are generally issued within 7 business days for credit card purchases and 20 days for other payment methods (in the DOT’s consumer guidance framing). Use that as the start of the timeline, not the end, when BNPL is involved.
    Source: DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

  4. How does your BNPL provider reflect refunds?
    BNPL providers may depend on the merchant processing the refund first; then the BNPL account reflects it; and any money owed back to your card can take additional business days depending on the financial institution.
    Source: Afterpay refunds article (Jul 6, 2023)

  5. Does the BNPL provider’s “buyer protection” actually cover travel services?
    At least one major BNPL “buyer protection” policy explicitly excludes services such as plane tickets and accommodations. If travel is excluded, ignore the marketing and rely on the merchant’s cancellation terms plus the relevant dispute/refund framework.
    Source: Klarna Buyer Protection policy

B. Due‑date questions (the cash-flow)

  1. List every installment date before you book.
    Pay‑in‑4 is typically structured as a down payment with the remainder in two‑week intervals. If you’re booking multiple components, the cadence can overlap.
    Source: CFPB BNPL Market Report (Dec 2025 PDF)

  2. Can you cover installments during a “refund pending” period?
    CFPB examiners found disputes could take months in some cases, and delayed investigations could lead to unpredictable catch‑up payment demands. Your plan needs to survive that window.
    Source: CFPB Supervisory Highlights Issue 37 (Jan 6, 2025)

  3. If you dispute, does your provider pause payments—and how do you initiate the dispute?
    The CFPB’s 2024 interpretive position and prepared remarks emphasize credit‑card‑like dispute and refund handling expectations, including that consumers can dispute with the BNPL lender, the lender investigates, consumers generally should not have to make payments while the dispute is investigated, and refunds should be reflected as credits. But you should verify the provider’s intake process and keep documentation (screenshots/help pages) for your specific product flow.
    Sources: CFPB interpretive action (May 22, 2024), CFPB prepared remarks (May 22, 2024)

Scorecard: Travel BNPL, graded for portability and refund resilience

Use this scorecard to evaluate any BNPL provider for travel. I’m not scoring a specific brand here; the point is to give you a consistent rubric.

Criteria (portability-first) What “Good” looks like What to look for in docs
Refund pipeline clarity Clear statement of how refunds move from merchant to BNPL to you Refund/returns help pages; “merchant must process first” language (e.g., Afterpay)
Dispute process & pause behavior Clear dispute intake steps; clear statement about payments during investigation CFPB expectations; provider’s dispute flow screenshots
Merchant-of-record handling Clear guidance when purchase is via OTA/agent DOT merchant-of-record emphasis for refunds
Timing transparency Explicit timelines and status tracking for refund/credit posting DOT refund timing baseline; provider processing notes
Buyer-protection scope No misleading “protection” for categories that are excluded Exclusions for services/travel (e.g., Klarna)
Late-fee risk signals Clear triggers, notifications, and recovery path CFPB market report shows late fees occur in practice
Support accessibility Human escalation paths for disputes/refunds Provider support routes; regulator complaint pathways where applicable
Exit friction Easy account closure and clean final statement of obligations Can you close once paid? Any lingering “account” behavior?

If a provider is vague on the first four items, you’re not buying flexibility—you’re buying uncertainty.

Decision rules (so you leave with an answer)

BNPL can make sense for travel when:

BNPL is a bad fit for travel when:

  • Your plan depends on a refund arriving “in time” to cover installments. Supervisory findings show disputes/refunds can take far longer than consumers expect.
    Source: CFPB Supervisory Highlights Issue 37 (Jan 6, 2025)
  • You’re leaning on “buyer protection” marketing without checking exclusions—because at least some BNPL buyer protection explicitly excludes plane tickets and accommodations.
    Source: Klarna Buyer Protection policy
  • You can’t clearly identify the merchant of record (common with OTAs), which can complicate refund routing and accountability.
    Source: DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

Migration checklist: switching away from travel BNPL without downtime

If you’re currently using BNPL for travel and want to reduce refund and due‑date stress, here’s a portability-first switch plan that minimizes surprises:

  1. Inventory every open installment and due date (one list, one place). Use a neutral tracker; if you already categorize spending, keep BNPL installments clearly labeled as installments so you don’t double-count.

  2. Identify refunds-in-flight: any booking that is canceled/changed or under dispute. For U.S. flights, cross-check the DOT refund scenarios and timing expectations so you know your baseline.
    Source: DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

  3. Confirm merchant-of-record per booking (airline vs agent/OTA). Write down who you must contact and where the confirmation emails live.
    Source: DOT Refunds Guidance (Nov 7, 2025)

  4. Build a “refund pending” buffer plan for at least one installment cycle. Supervisory findings show disputes can drag on and cause catch-up payment stress.
    Source: CFPB Supervisory Highlights Issue 37 (Jan 6, 2025)

  5. Document the dispute path before you need it: screenshots of the BNPL provider’s dispute intake and any guidance about pausing payments during investigation. The CFPB has emphasized these expectations, but you want provider-specific proof.
    Sources: CFPB interpretive action (May 22, 2024), CFPB prepared remarks (May 22, 2024)

  6. Stop stacking pay‑in‑4 plans for one trip (flight + hotel + activities) until existing ones close. The two‑week cadence is the trap; it’s easy to create overlapping obligations.
    Source: CFPB BNPL Market Report (Dec 2025 PDF)

  7. Audit recurring charges tied to travel (membership fees, subscriptions, insurance add-ons) while you’re switching. A minimalist budgeting tool like Monee can help you categorize and spot recurring items during the transition, without relying on ad-driven tracking.

Red flags box: what to watch for in any BNPL + travel setup

Red flags (portability killers)

Jurisdiction note (UK readers)

The UK regulatory baseline for BNPL is changing: the FCA has announced plans to bring (currently unregulated) BNPL under FCA rules, including affordability checks, support for borrowers in difficulty, and access to the Financial Ombudsman Service, intended to take effect when BNPL comes under FCA remit in 2026. If you’re booking travel from the UK, treat protections and complaint pathways as jurisdiction-specific and check the FCA and provider documentation.
Source: FCA press release (Jul 18, 2025)

Bottom line: a simple pass/fail test

If you can answer these three questions confidently, BNPL may be acceptable for your trip:

  1. Who is the merchant of record, and what’s my refund baseline? (Use DOT guidance for U.S. flights.)
  2. What exactly happens to my payments during a dispute/refund? (Confirm the provider’s process and pause behavior.)
  3. Can I cover every installment even if the refund takes far longer than expected? (Plan for the “refund pending” window.)

If any of those are unclear, BNPL isn’t a travel perk—it’s a portability problem.

Sources:

Discover Monee - Budget & Expense Tracker

Coming soon on Google Play
Download on the App Store